|
|
Young people emphasized as key to rural
revitalization
Reprinted from The Watertown Public Opinion
By Mary Gales Askren
November 24, 2006
SUMMIT - Community leaders from
four counties were introduced to a new concept in rural economic development at
a meeting in Summit on Tuesday afternoon: schools and young people are an
integral part of community revitalization.
“This is our one big idea,” Lindsey Karlson said to those in attendance. “Youth
might be the strongest catalysts for change in your community.”
At a meeting organized by Whetstone Valley Business Opportunities, Inc., Karlson
along with Dr. Jim Beddow, executive director of the Rural Learning Center in
Howard, and Randy Parry, executive director of Miner County Community
Revitalization, shared their vision for community development based on their
experiences in Miner County. More than 50 people from Grant, Day, Marshall and
Roberts counties, including educators and students, were in attendance.
Whetstone Valley Business Opportunities, Inc., is a nonprofit organization
created to assist local entrepreneurs, according to Faye Frerichs, community
facilitator. She said the meeting was organized to educate area communities
about the importance of working together.
Parry began the presentation by using graphs to show that before the Howard
School District received funding through the Program for Rural School and
Community Renewal in 1995, the population in Miner County had been in an 80 year
decline and that the number of jobs created in the county had not increased as
it had in the state during that same period.
Beginning with student-led discussions at the school and small group meetings in
homes, the community began to identify its strengths and weaknesses. Parry said
that over a period of 18 months, 341 meetings were held in the community to
develop a community vision and to identify the underlying causes of community
problems.
“The issue is the underlying
causes to the problems. You have to come up with solutions to the underlying
causes,” he said.
Among these was fragmented leadership, according to Parry. The local school
board was independent of the city council, which was independent of the county
commission, and community organizations, faith-based organizations, healthcare
facilities and financial institutions weren't involved in decision-making.
In order to tackle the big problems of economic development, housing and
capacity building, a community leadership council with representatives from all
sectors was created, Parry said. As a result, over a five-year period,
participation in implementing the community's strategic plan increased 170%.
Beddow emphasized the importance of commitment to community revitalization.
“It takes a concentrated,
sustained effort. You have to stay with it and stay with it and start small,” he
said.
According to Beddow, the Rural Learning Center was created to assist rural
communities for the long haul, unlike programs that go into a community, get
people fired up and leave. Organized around three core principles - concrete
collaboration, shared learning and sustainable strategies, the emphasis is on
teaching communities how to work together and to learn from each other.
“There is a basic inclination to work together, but people don't know how to do
it because they're used to competition,” Beddow said.
Before collaboration can happen, he said, local people have to answer the
question, “What's in it for us?” Once they see the benefits, they can envision a
broader, more global community and people can start working together.
Because school districts have teachers, facilities, technology, curriculum and
students, they need to be involved, according to Beddow.
“We have a very strong bias that the school district has to be a major player,”
he said. “We don't have the opinion that school districts can save rural
communities, but it's a piece of the puzzle.”
Karlson talked about the talent, ideas and manpower that students can bring to
community development. She said that getting young people involved in their
community also increases the likelihood that they will return to the community
in adulthood.
Parry showed that two student projects had a significant impact on Miner County.
The first was a cash flow study. After the results were presented in a
power-point presentation, and people understood the impact of their spending
habits, gross sales in Miner County increased $15.6 million or 41.1 percent in
one year.
Another study involved the economic impact of transfer payments - social
security and other benefits received by senior citizens. Students also looked at
other contributions that senior citizens make to the community by volunteering
and contributing other resources. By doing this, they were able to quantify the
benefits of keeping senior citizens in the community.
“If five seniors leave the community, it's like a small business leaving your
community,” Parry said.
Frerichs said that people left the meeting energized by possibilities, and that
she has already received phone calls from individuals with ideas. Students will
be part of any project that gets started, she said. |